<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!-- generator="wordpress/2.2.2" -->
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>The duly noted® blog</title>
	<link>http://www.dulynoted.co.uk/blog</link>
	<description>“About the business of copyright - and us.”</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 01 May 2008 20:09:22 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.2.2</generator>
	<language>en</language>
			<item>
		<title>Is Poor Man’s Copyright Good Enough?  10 Reasons To Look Again!</title>
		<link>http://www.dulynoted.co.uk/blog/2008/05/01/is-poor-man%e2%80%99s-copyright-good-enough-10-reasons-to-look-again/</link>
		<comments>http://www.dulynoted.co.uk/blog/2008/05/01/is-poor-man%e2%80%99s-copyright-good-enough-10-reasons-to-look-again/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 May 2008 20:09:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>julian</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[copyright registration]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dulynoted.co.uk/blog/2008/05/01/is-poor-man%e2%80%99s-copyright-good-enough-10-reasons-to-look-again/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I’ve been asked by a number of clients the past couple of months what’s the difference between our registration service and the classic method of creatives use to provide evidence they have copyright on a work; the so-called “Poor Man’s Copyright”?  So I thought it might be worthwhile explaining. 
In case you’re not aware of what [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.dulynoted.co.uk/blog/2008/05/01/is-poor-man%e2%80%99s-copyright-good-enough-10-reasons-to-look-again/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
